DPanswers
Ultra Wide Angle Zooms for DSLRs
This is a link farm, linking to all online reviews of ultra-wide rectilinear zooms for digital SLRs I am aware of. I have listed zooms that cover a wider field of view (FOV) than 100 degrees. This will be 18 mm for FX-format (aka. “full frame” or “135-format”), 12 mm for the DX-format, and wider than 9 mm for Four-thirds.
The table consists if two parts. The first part lists lenses that can be used on all small format SLR cameras. The second half lists lenses that is suitable for DX-sized (or smaller) sensors, and will vignette on FX-format sensors.
The prices are taken from the B&H web January – October 2007.
| Lenses that can be used on all DSLRs: | ||||||
| Brand | Zoom | Aperture | Designation | Abbriv. | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon | 16-35mm | f/2.8 | EF USM L | Ca16-35 | $1370 | 1. |
| Canon | 16-35mm | f/2.8 | EF USM II L | Ca16-35ii | $1599 | 1. |
| Canon | 17-35mm | f/2.8 | EF USM L | Ca17-35 | ? | 1. |
| Canon | 17-40mm | f/4.0 | EF USM L | Ca17-40 | $635 | 1. |
| Nikon | 14-24mm | f/2.8 | G AF-S ED | Ni14-24 | $1800 | 1. |
| Nikon | 17-35mm | f/2.8 | D AF-S IF-ED | Ni17-35 | $1460 | 1. |
| Nikon | 18-35mm | f/4.0 | D IF-ED | Ni18-35 | $400 | 1. |
| Sigma | 12-24mm | f/4.5-5.6 | EX HSM DG | Si12-24 | $689 | 1. |
| Sigma | 15-30mm | f/3.5-4.5 | EX DG DF | Si15-30 | $499 | 1. |
| Sigma | 17-35mm | f/2.8-4.0 | EX HSM DG | Si17-35 | $479 | 1. |
| Tamron | 17-35mm | f/2.8-4.0 | SP AF Di LD IF | Ta17-35 | $289 | 1. |
| Lenses that only work on DSLRs with DX size (or smaller) sensors: | ||||||
| Brand | Zoom | Aperture | Designation | Abbriv. | Price | Notes |
| Canon | 10-22mm | f/3.5-4.5 | EF-S USM | Ca10-22 | $675 | |
| Nikon | 12-24mm | f/4.0 | G AF-S IF-ED DX | Ni12-24 | $895 | |
| Olympus | 7-14mm | f/4.0 | E-ED | Ol7-14 | $1450 | 2. |
| Olympus | 9-18mm | f/4.0-5.6 | ED | Ol9-18 | $599 | 2. |
| Pentax | 12-24mm | f/4.0 | DA ED AL IF | To12-24 | $620 | 3. |
| Sigma | 10-20mm | f/4.0-5.6 | EX HSM DC | Si10-20 | $499 | |
| Sony | 11-18mm | f/4.5-5.6 | AF DT | Ta11-18 | $650 | 4. |
| Tamron | 10-24mm | f/3.5-4.5 | SP AF Di II LD IF | Ta10-24 | ? | |
| Tamron | 11-18mm | f/4.5-5.6 | SP AF Di II LD IF | Ta11-18 | $499 | 4. |
| Tokina | 11-16mm | f/2.8 | AT-X Pro IF SD DX | To11-16 | $570 | |
| Tokina | 12-24mm | f/4.0 | AT-X Pro DX | To12-24 | $500 | 3. |
Notes:
- Covers FX-format (aka. full frame or 135-format).
- Four-thirds format (2.0x crop factor).
- Pentax is supposed to have developed this in cooperation with Tokina, so they should be identical optically. However, mechanical construction and coatings are not identical. Measured zoom range is closer to 13-23mm.
- Sony is supposed to have licensed this from Tamron, so they should be identical optically. However, mechanical construction and coatings are not identical. Also known as Konica Minolta 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 AF DT.
Below is links to reviews and tests available online of these lenses. I first link to stand-alone reviews, then to comparison tests. The reviews and tests appear in alphabetical order, and including them here do not imply endorsement in any shape or form.
Note that 16-9.net tests all lenses, including Nikkors, on Canon FX-format (full frame) digital cameras, and PhotoZone.de tests lenses designed for the FX-format on Canon digital cameras with a 1.6x crop factor. If a test is conducted on a diffent platform than one would expect, it is noted in a comment (in brackets) after the link to the test.
Stand-alone reviews
Reviews where a single wide angle zoom is compared to a top-class fixed focal length lens for reference (as noted) do also appear in this section.
Canon 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 EF-S USM
Solidly built, but not professional grade. Some vignetting, otherwise very good performance.
- Bob Atkins
- Camera Labs
- Fotografi (in Norwegian)
- PhotoZone.de
- Ken Rockwell
- Michael Reichmann
- Shutterbug
- SlrLensReview.con
See also comparison tests.
Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 EF USM L
Constant f/2.8 aperture. Not considered a great performer, with poor corner softness. Replaced with Mark II in 2007.
- 16-9.net (vs. Olympus 18mm f/4 & Contax/Zeiss 18mm f/4)
- PhotoZone.de (@ 1.6x)
- SLRgear.com
See also comparison tests.
Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 EF USM II L
Introduced in April 2007. Constant f/2.8 aperture. Some regard this as a significant improvement on Mark I, others think it just a small improvement.
- 16-9.net (vs. Leica 19mm f/2.8 & Olympus 18mm f/3.5)
- Finn Magne Grande (vs. Canon 24-105mm f/4.0 EF L; in Norwegian)
See also comparison tests.
Canon 17-35mm f/2.8 EF USM L
Discontinued. Constant f/2.8 aperture. Not highly regarded.
- PhotoZone.de (@ 1.6x)
Canon 17-40mm f/4.0 EF USM L
Not a fast lens, but constant f/4.0 aperture. Performs well over the range. Good value.
- 16-9.net (vs. Contax/Zeiss Distagon 21mm f/2.8 T)
- PhotoZone.de (@ 1.6x)
- PopPhoto.com
- SlrLensReview.con (@ 1.6x)
See also comparison tests.
Nikon 12-24mm f/4.0 G AF-S IF-ED DX
Solidly built, but not professional grade. Constant f/4.0 aperture. Almost no vignetting. Excellent at the long end, good at the wide end, but some edge softness and CA at 12 mm. Overall good performance, but perhaps not quite good enough to justify its high price tag?
See also comparison tests.
Nikon 14-24 f/2.8 G AF-S ED
The best ultrawide lens ever made. Constant f/2.8 aperture. Even better than the fixed focal length Nikkor 14mm f/2.8.
See also comparison tests.
Nikon 17-35 f/2.8 D AF-S IF-ED
A very good lens. Professional grade. Constant f/2.8 aperture.
- 16-9.net (vs. Contax/Zeiss Distagon 18mm f/4.0 T*, @ Canon)
- 16-9.net (vs. Contax/Zeiss N Vario Sonnar AF T* 17-35 f/2.8 T*, pt. 1, @ Canon)
- 16-9.net (vs. Contax/Zeiss N Vario Sonnar AF T* 17-35 f/2.8 T*, pt. 2, @ Canon)
- PhotoZone.de (@ DX)
- Bjørn Rørslett
See also comparison tests.
Nikon 18-35mm f/4.0 D IF-ED
Small and light. Consumer grade. Constant f/4.0 aperture. Vignetting and corner softness at the the wide end.
Olympus 7-14mm f/4.0 E-ED
The second best ultrawide lens ever made. Constant f/4.0 aperture.
- Camera Labs
- ePhotoZine
- Fotografi (in Norwegian)
Olympus 9-18mm f/4.0-5.6 ED
Announced, but not yet available (expected fall 2008). No reviews found, yet.
Sigma 10-20mm f/4.0-5.6 EX HSM DC
Solid build, ring HSM. Good overall sharpness and well-controlled aberrations and flare. Some vignetting and mustache distortions at the wide end. Some sample variation – most bad samples are uncentered, making one corner visibly less sharp than the others. This is my choice for ultrawide zoom. Since I bought it in March 2006, it has been stuck on the camera. It has become my favourite lens. For examples of images I've taken with this lens, please take look at my Flickr page.
- Peter Bernik (@ Canon)
- John Friend (@ Nikon)
- ePhotoZine (@ Canon)
- Thom Hogan (@ Nikon
- PhotoZone.de (@ Canon)
- PhotoZone.de (@ Nikon)
- SLRgear.com
- SlrLensReview.con (@ Canon)
See also comparison tests.
Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX HSM DG
Widest there is for FX. However, less sharp than its DX brother (Sigma 10-20mm). Huge, bulging front element (this lens is known as “Popeye” to its friends). No filter threads. Some sample variations.
- 16-9.net (vs. Canon 14mm f2.8 L & Nikon 14mm f/2.8 ED IF, @ Canon)
- 16-9.net (vs. Voigtlander Heliar 15mm f/4.5, @ Canon)
- 16-9.net (vs. Nikon 15mm f/3.5 AIS, @ Canon)
- Finn Magne Grande (in Norwegian; @ Canon)
- PhotoZone.de (@ Canon 1.6x)
- PhotoZone.de (@ Nikon DX)
- Shutterbug
- Petteri Sulonen (@ Canon 1.6x)
See also comparison tests.
Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 EX DG DF
Excellent build quality and sharpness. Flare well controlled. Pronounced barrel distortions at the wide end. Some vignetting and softer edges on FX. Bulging front element. No filter threads
- PhotoZone.de (@ Canon 1.6x)
- Thom Hogan (@ Nikon DX)
- Shutterbug (@ Canon EOS-3)
See also comparison tests.
Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4.0 EX HSM DG
- Shutterbug (@ Canon EOS-3)
Tamron 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 SP AF Di II LD IF
Announced, but not yet available. No reviews found, yet.
Tamron 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 SP AF Di II LD IF, Sony 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 AF DT
Warm colour rendering. Consumer grade build quality.
- Bob Atkins (Tamron @ Canon)
- Camera Labs (Sony @ Sony)
- Michael Reichmann (Tamron @ Canon)
- PhotoZone.de (Tamron @ Canon)
- PhotoZone.de (Sony @ Sony)
- PopPhoto.com (Sony @ Sony)
See also comparison tests.
Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4.0 SP AF Di LD IF
- Shutterbug (@ Canon EOS-3)
Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro IF SD DX
Solid build. Constant f/2.8 aperture. Sharp. Fast. Some CA and flare. Good value.
- Koh Kho King (@ Nikon)
- PhotoZone.de (@ Canon)
- Ken Rockwell (@ Nikon)
See also comparison tests.
Tokina 12-24mm f/4.0 AT-X Pro DX, Pentax 12-24mm f/4.0 DA ED AL IF
Solid build. Nice contrast. Constant f/4.0 aperture. Possibly the sharpest for the DX format, but some CA and flare problems. Measured zoom range is closer to 13-23mm. The lens is usable on a FX body with little vignetting from 17mm with no lens hood, and from 18mm with lens hood mounted.
- Jim Strutz (Tokina @ Nikon)
- Hans K. Aspenberg (in Norwegian, Tokina @ Canon)
- PhotoZone.de (Tokina @ Canon)
- PhotoZone.de (Tokina @ Nikon)
- SLRgear.com (Tokina @ Nikon)
- SlrLensReview.con (Tokina @ Canon)
See also comparison tests.
Comparison tests
In the list of lenses compared, I use the abbreviations listed in the table above to refer to individual zooms. The names of the fixed focal length lenses that also are included in some tests are not abbreviated.
- Ca10-22, To11-16: LightRules (@ Canon)
- Ca16-35, Ni17-35: 16-9.net (+ Olympus 18mm f/4, Contax/Zeiss 18mm f/4, @ Canon)
- Ca16-35, Ca16-35ii: Marty Sedluk (+ Canon 24mm f/1.4 L, @ 1DsII)
- Ca17-40, Ni17-35: 16-9.net (+ Contax/Zeiss Distagon 21mm f/2.8 T, @ Canon)
- Ca17-40, Si12-24, Si15-30dg: 16-9.net (+ Contax/Zeiss Distagon 21mm f/2.8 T, @ Canon)
- Ni12-24, Si10-20, Ta11-18, To12-24: Ken Rockwell (@ Nikon)
- Ni12-24, Si10-20, Ta11-18, To12-24: Nikonians (@ Nikon)
- Ni14-24, Si12-24, 16-9.net (+ Canon 24mm f/1.4 L, @ Canon))
- Ni17-35, Si15-30dg: 16-9.net (+ Zuiko 21mm f/2.8, @ Canon)
- Si10-20, Ta11-18, To12-24: Shutterbug (@ Canon)
- Si10-20, To12-24: LightRules (@ Canon)
- Si12-24, Si15-30dg: 16-9.net (@ Canon)
Link farm
Below is some sites I regularly check for lens reviews:
- Editorial:
- 16-9.net
- Camera Labs
- Digit.no (in Norwegian)
- Diwa-Labs.com
- DPreview.com
- Fotografi (in Norwegian)
- Nikonians
- PhotoZone.de
- SLRgear
- Shutterbug
- SlrLensReview.com
- The-Digital-Picture.com
- Individuals:
- Users:
If you want to comment, or have a new review to contribute, please use the blog!
About DPanswers | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | FAQ | Contact